From 630a7fa3cb731a79add0a913ca87d3b7e2219f6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Alex A. Naanou" Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 05:38:50 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] notes... Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou --- ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js b/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js index f01db365..7ea07570 100755 --- a/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js +++ b/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js @@ -963,10 +963,14 @@ module.Dialogs = core.ImageGridFeatures.Feature({ // XXX EXPERIMENT... // - which is more logical the generic make.Field(..) or the -// .__editor_fields__ API??? +// .makeEditor(..) and friends??? // - how do we handle the ImageGrid context here (i.e. actions)??? // ...one way would be to split the fields into two levels, the // generic and the domain-specific... +// ...one way could be something like: +// make.setGetterContext(context) +// and in all the getters use: +// getter.call(make.getterContext, ...) // XXX REVISE... browse.items.Field = function(actions, options){