more notes...

Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou <alex.nanou@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex A. Naanou 2019-11-21 15:54:16 +03:00
parent 630a7fa3cb
commit d7bcf1cd0a

View File

@ -964,6 +964,12 @@ module.Dialogs = core.ImageGridFeatures.Feature({
// XXX EXPERIMENT... // XXX EXPERIMENT...
// - which is more logical the generic make.Field(..) or the // - which is more logical the generic make.Field(..) or the
// .makeEditor(..) and friends??? // .makeEditor(..) and friends???
// or should we have both??
// ...there is merit in having a "storable" dialog so regardless
// of the final architecture, it would be logical to have:
// - simple generic Array / Object / JSON constructors...
// - storable "full" format constructors...
// - the make(..) and friends API for custom stuff...
// - how do we handle the ImageGrid context here (i.e. actions)??? // - how do we handle the ImageGrid context here (i.e. actions)???
// ...one way would be to split the fields into two levels, the // ...one way would be to split the fields into two levels, the
// generic and the domain-specific... // generic and the domain-specific...