From f8a030d70941fed82c24fd73d7e0cae33bd7dd7c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Alex A. Naanou" <alex.nanou@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 08:35:55 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] notes...

Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou <alex.nanou@gmail.com>
---
 ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js b/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js
index c0aeba60..f01db365 100755
--- a/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js	
+++ b/ui (gen4)/features/ui-widgets.js	
@@ -962,6 +962,8 @@ module.Dialogs = core.ImageGridFeatures.Feature({
 
 
 // XXX EXPERIMENT...
+// 		- which is more logical the generic make.Field(..) or the 
+// 			.__editor_fields__ API???
 // 		- how do we handle the ImageGrid context here (i.e. actions)???
 // 			...one way would be to split the fields into two levels, the 
 // 			generic and the domain-specific...