reworked the .name handling back -- neither chrome nor ff show the correct name otherwise...

Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou <alex.nanou@gmail.com>

object.js

@@ -217,7 +217,11 @@ function(obj){
 		// NOTE: we just created func(..) so no need to sanitize it, the 
 		// 		only potential vector of atack (AFAIK) here is name and 
 		// 		that is checked above...
-		Object.defineProperty(func, 'name', {value: name})
+		func = eval('('+ 
+			func
+				.toString()
+				.replace(/function\(/, `function ${name}(`) +')')
+		//Object.defineProperty(func, 'name', {value: name})
 		/* XXX NAME...
 		//func.name = name
 		func.name != name
@@ -916,28 +920,15 @@ function Constructor(name, a, b, c){
 		obj.__init__ instanceof Function
 			&& obj.__init__(...arguments)
 		return obj }
-
+	// rename the consructor...
-	// constructor naming...
 	// NOTE: we are not using:
 	//			Object.defineProperty(_constructor, 'name', { value: name })
-	//		because this does not affect the name displayed by the Chrome
+	//		because this does not affect the name displayed by the DevTools.
-	//		DevTools. FF does not seem to care about either version of code...
+	_constructor = eval('('+ 
-	Object.defineProperty(_constructor, 'name', {value: name})
+		_constructor
-	/* XXX NAME...
+			.toString()
-	//_constructor.name = name
+			.replace(/Constructor/g, name) +')')
-	// just in case the browser/node refuses to change the name, we'll make
+
-	// them a different offer ;)
-	// NOTE: it is not possible to abstract this eval(..) into something 
-	// 		like renameFunction(..) as reconstructing the function will
-	// 		lose it's closure that we depend on here...
-	// NOTE: this eval(..) should not be a risk as its inputs are
-	// 		static and never infuenced by external inputs...
-	_constructor.name != name
-		&& (_constructor = eval('('+ 
-			_constructor
-				.toString()
-				.replace(/Constructor/g, name) +')'))
-	//*/
 	// set .toString(..)...
 	// NOTE: this test is here to enable mixinFlat(..) to overwrite 
 	// 		.toString(..) below...
@@ -1309,6 +1300,8 @@ Constructor('Mixin', {
 		// NOTE: we do not need to configure this any more, .defineProperty(..)
 		// 		merges the descriptor into the original keeping any values not
 		// 		explicitly overwritten...
+		// XXX is this effective???
+		// 		...will this show up in DevTools???
 		Object.defineProperty(this, 'name', { value: name })
 		// create/merge .data...
 		this.data = this.constructor.mixinFlat({}, 

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "ig-object",
-  "version": "6.1.2",
+  "version": "6.1.4",
   "description": "",
   "main": "object.js",
   "scripts": {