flynx/object.js
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/flynx/object.js.git synced 2025-10-31 19:40:09 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

updated docs...

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou <alex.nanou@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex A. Naanou 2020-04-26 21:32:13 +03:00
parent ed1dd3a2b6
commit e92cab8659
2 changed files with 7 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
README.md
View File

@ -168,8 +168,11 @@ take care of both the _function constructor_ and `prototype.__call__(..)`
handling. handling.
**Notes:** **Notes:**
- this now is an instance method, in the future this may (or may not) - `.__new__(..)` is an instance method, contrary to _Python_ that served
move to being a class method... as an inspiration for this protocol. This is done intentionally as in
JavaScript there is no distinction between an instance and a class and
defining `.__new__(..)` in the class would both add complexity as well
as restrict the use-cases for the constructor.
## Components ## Components
@ -202,7 +205,7 @@ mixinFlat(<root>, <object>, ...)
This is like `Object.assign(..)` but copies property objects rather than This is like `Object.assign(..)` but copies property objects rather than
property values. property values.
Make a raw instance Make a raw (un-initialized) instance
``` ```
makeRawInstance(<context>, <constructor>, ...) makeRawInstance(<context>, <constructor>, ...)
-> <object> -> <object>

1
object.js
View File

@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* *
* *
* XXX should this extend Object??? * XXX should this extend Object???
* ...if yes then it would also be logical to move Object.run(..) here
* *
**********************************************************************/ **********************************************************************/
((typeof define)[0]=='u'?function(f){module.exports=f(require)}:define)( ((typeof define)[0]=='u'?function(f){module.exports=f(require)}:define)(