flynx/test.js
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/flynx/test.js.git synced 2026-10-03 04:41:37 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

notes and refactoring...

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Alex A. Naanou <alex.nanou@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex A. Naanou 2025-12-28 18:21:27 +03:00
parent 791853fb2e
commit 9250679f3a
1 changed files with 33 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

43
test.js
View File

@ -263,17 +263,18 @@ object.Constructor('Assert', {
// XXX
var mergeIter = function(iter){
// XXX should this get a function as argument???
return function(c){
c = c || this
return (c.members || [])
.map(function(e){ return Object[iter](e) })
.map(function(e){
return Object[iter](e) })
.flat() } }
// - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
// Object representing the sum of all it's members.
//
// Merged(name, func)
// -> merged
@ -282,12 +283,23 @@ var mergeIter = function(iter){
// -> merged
//
//
// Merged is the sum of all its members.
//
// XXX is this generic enough to be moved to ig-types???
// XXX revise: members either need to be mixed in or not, now both are
// done:
// .__init__(..) - adds and mixes in
// .add(..) / .remove(..) / .clear() - only add
// another issue is the set of iterators, they either go through
// all attributes of al members (as-is now) or go through local
// attributes...
// -> decide if we mixin or store, and make this consistent.
var Merged =
module.Merged =
object.Constructor('Merged', {
// can be:
// 'warn' (default)
// 'fail'
// 'ignore'
__shadow_handling__: 'warn',
__members: undefined,
get members(){
return this.__members == null ?
@ -310,6 +322,7 @@ object.Constructor('Merged', {
var k = this.keys()
return k.length - (k.includes('-') ? 1 : 0) },
// XXX should this object.mixinFlat(this, other) like is done in .__init__(..) ???
add: function(member){
this.members.push(member)
return this },
@ -323,6 +336,7 @@ object.Constructor('Merged', {
delete this.__members
return this },
// XXX if the above use mixin/mixout, should these simply use Object's API???
keys: mergeIter('keys'),
values: mergeIter('values'),
entries: mergeIter('entries'),
@ -349,14 +363,19 @@ object.Constructor('Merged', {
.filter(function(k){
return existing.has(k) }) })
.flat() },
handleShadowing: function(shadowed){
shadowed.length > 0
&& console.warn(` WARNING:`.bold, `shadowing: ${shadowed.join()}`)
handleShadowing: function(shadowed, mode='warn'){
if(shadowed.length > 0
&& mode != 'ignore'){
if(mode == 'fail'){
throw new Error('ERR:'.bold, `shadowing: ${ shadowing.join() }`) }
console.warn(` WARNING:`.bold, `shadowing: ${shadowed.join()}`) }
return this },
create: function(name){
return object.Constructor(name || this.name, this, {}) },
}, {
//__shadow_handling__: 'warn',
filename: undefined,
__init__: function(other){
@ -374,7 +393,9 @@ object.Constructor('Merged', {
// check for shadowing...
this.constructor.handleShadowing(
this.constructor.checkShadowing(other))
this.constructor.checkShadowing(other),
this.__shadow_handling__
?? this.constructor.__shadow_handling__)
// mix and merge...
object.mixinFlat(this, other)
@ -387,7 +408,9 @@ object.Constructor('Merged', {
// Get tests from a test object...
//
var getTests = function(spec){
var getTests =
module.getTests =
function(spec){
var {setups, modifiers, tests, cases} = spec
;[setups, modifiers, tests, cases] =
[setups, modifiers, tests, cases]